ספרים באנגלית

Published July 2010
(Jewish Political Studies Review 22:1-2 (Spring 2010

Nazis on the Run
Nazis auf der Flucht. Wie Kriegsverbrecher über Italien nach Übersee entkamen (Nazis on the Run: How War Criminals Escaped Overseas via Italy), by Gerald Steinacher, StudienVerlag, 2008, 380 pp. [German]
Reviewed by Wolfgang G. Schwanitz

Gerald Steinacher, a historian from the west Austrian town of Innsbruck, is known for his solid research on the federal state of Tyrolunder the Third Reich. His new book reconstructs how Nazis fled from Europe via Italyto South Americaafter the end of World War II. The author also claims that his research proves that stories about a secret organization of former SS members are nothing more than a myth. According to this thesis, ODESSA, the Organisation Der Ehemaligen SS Angehörigen (organization of former SS members), did not exist. Before dealing with this finding in the context of the Middle East, an overview of the book is in order.

Steinacher first discusses the southern escape route viaRometoGenoaand other Italian towns. He then explores the mechanism of obtaining a new identity through Red Cross papers, and details how Vaticancircles provided assistance. The reader learns all about the “Rat Run” from Germany through Italyand finally to the safe haven ofArgentina.Italy, Steinacher notes, wasEurope’s backyard. But it was also, like Spain and Portugal, the Middle East’s front yard.

Three major organizations helped the Nazis escape from Europe. The Catholic Church believed this effort would contribute to the “re-Christianization” of Europe and feared the threat to Europe of paganism and communism. In the pursuit of its political and spiritual interests, it was quick to forgive Nazi war criminals. The CIA, in the context of the Cold War, was eager to do business and assist former Nazis, such as Klaus Barbie.  In addition, the International Red Cross demonstrated great sympathy for war criminals and issued some twenty-five thousand identity documents. Steinacher deals with all this, but some earlier organizations for helping Nazi fugitives are missing such as Edelweiss, Spinne, and Sechsgestirn.

Steinacher also defines three Nazi groups: those who (a) committed suicide at the war’s end or later, (b) were indicted or punished, or (c) fled overseas, mostly toArgentina. The real numbers are not available. The author estimates that 180 leading Nazis emigrated to Argentina. Others speak of about three hundred to eight hundred making their way to that country. Uki Goni reported that Argentina still protected about forty-nine files of Nazi immigrants in 2003.[1] Recently, the independent German researcher Volker Koop estimated that six hundred Nazis emigrated to Argentina including those with expert knowledge.[2]

Information for the Middle East, which is not a main topic of this book, is hard to find. We know of three dozen cases of Nazi immigrants – in North Africa including Algeriaand Tunisia, in Arab neighbors of Israel, and in Saudi Arabia and Iran. Indications also point to Afghanistan andPakistan.

For 1964 onward, estimates of the number of Nazis living in Arab countries climb beyond three thousand with Egyptas their main destination. This may be valid if one includes professional experts and advisers, technicians, and physicians, such as Aribert Heim who died in Cairo in 1992 but became the subject of news reports only in2008. Inaddition, for the Middle East, there are other categories of former Nazis such as: (d) combatants who fought in wars in 1949, 1956, or1964 inPalestine/Israel, Egypt, and Algeria, (e) bureaucratic “shadow warriors” in fields of security, prison administration, education, and propaganda, (f) military experts, and (g) diplomats. For lack of archival access, and because many changed their names when converting to Islam, especially the “shadow warriors” are difficult to trace.

Clerical Collaborators

Steinacher similarly describes “de-Nazification through conversion” to Catholicism as a means of obtaining assistance. He notes the role of the pro-Nazi bishop Alois Hudal and of the monastery escape route. Hudal tried to build bridges between the Nazi ideology and the Church.[3] In 1937, he sent his book The Foundations of National Socialism to Hitler. The Grand Mufti of Jerusalem sought a similar ideological convergence; as early as 1937 Hajj Amin al-Husaini appealed to all Muslims to cleanse their lands of Jews. [4] The Nazis made a booklet of his appeal, added a section on Islam and Bolshevism, and translated it for their Muslim soldiers.[5]

However, there was a difference between these clerical collaborators with the Nazis. Whereas Hudal said that fighting Jews as a race was anti-Christian, al-Husaini aspired to fight them as a race. According to Hudal’s ideological reasoning, a conflict could be settled if ideologies became compatible. According to al-Husaini’s racist approach, the conflict was existential and could only end by the annihilation of the other side, which could never change its race.

As for Nazi military experts (category f),Cairoemployed two units as advisers from 1949 to 1956. Ex-general Wilhelm Fahrmbacher led a group of military experts called “Armed Forces” with thirty-one men, and Wilhelm Voss of the Nazis’ wartime Škoda factories (he was not one of Hitler’s adjutants as claimed on p. 290) led the unit called “Research Center for Explosives and Weapons” with fifteen men in 1953.[6] Their numbers grew, but their contracts were not renewed when the Egyptians became aware that Israel had forged links with them for spies such as Max Bineth. These developments were intertwined with Israel’s Lavon Affair, which involved faulty espionage actions inEgyptand led to Defense Minister Pinhas Lavon’s resignation in 1954. The affair also gave Gamel Abdel Nasser a pretext to overthrow and succeed President Muhammad Najib.[7]

However, with Argentina hoping to attract up to half a million Germans right after the war, and President Juan Perón’s former Nazi experts building the country’s first jet fighter, the Pulqui II, in 1951, an example was also provided for the Arabs. President Nasser hired the aircraft designer and manufacturer Willy Messerschmitt and the missile expert Wolfgang Pilz, who in 1964 gotEgypt’s first jet fighter, the Hulwan 300, airborne. Since Messerschmitt’s company also maintained a presence inSpain, Nazi circles there connected with Cairoas well. When the project ran short of money,India ultimately took over key parts for its Marut 24 jet.

As for the category of former Nazi diplomats (g), this is usually disregarded though it is a missing dimension at least for the  Middle East. Some rebuilt old networks. For his part, Chancellor Konrad Adenauer insisted on reemploying so-called indispensable experts despite their Nazi backgrounds. Too many became envoys of theBonnRepublic- an outrage that had long-term results. In 1947, West Germans drew up a list of 576 names as candidates for their future Foreign Service. Indeed, that number of people staffed the service until the end of 1952. Of these, 195 had been Nazi Party members, 158 were from the old Foreign Ministry, and fifty-seven had had involvement with the Middle East.[8] More research on these diplomats’ ties with emigrant Nazis and their Islamist counterparts is required to substantiate the long-lasting “Brown-Green” relationship.

New evidence has emerged on how these individuals overtly and covertly interacted. Steinacher mentions the 1974 movie The Odessa File based on the book by Frederick Forsyth that appeared two years before. Steinacher warns against falling for a myth that there was one organization under this cover name (7, 16, 296). So far the author’s main thesis.

But here is the problem: beginning in the late 1940s and for the Middle East in the mid-1950s, American agents reported on ODESSA and also pointed to tripartite circles of ex-Nazis in South America, the Middle East, and Europe. After the fall of Perón’s regime, the Argentine haven became less hospitable and some ex-Nazis took jobs in theMiddle Eastoften with al-Husaini’s support.

For example, the odious agitator Johann von Leers moved from Buenos Aires to Cairo to work in anti-Israeli campaigns sponsored by Nasser’s circle and the Arab League.[9] He met men of the former Third Reich such as Anwar as-Sadat, who had been a spy for the Nazis, members of the two above mentioned units (category f), and many (e) “shadow people” in Middle Eastern bureaucracies.

American intelligence services monitored Nazi organizations that spanned those three regions. They mentioned, for instance, “List 1” of two thousand ex-members of the SS and the Gestapo, of which the most importantODESSAmembers were also on their  Most Wanted list. Intelligence reports since 1964 often namedODESSAnetworks. Leers was said to be the new regional leader of the Spider Web network, as it was also known, in Cairo, and former SS colonel Otto Skorzeny was said to be its leader in Spain. InCairo, al-Husaini met with Skorzeny in early 1953 to work out weapons deals.[10]

An Outstanding Contribution

Three conclusions emerge. First, ODESSA was very much a reality and an operational term for American intelligence since 1947 when it appeared for the first time in reports. To what degree Simon Wiesenthal contributed with his related reports to the Americans remains an open question.[11]

Although Steinacher is correct in including all the regional networks in his purview, he is not right to claim that ODESSA was nothing but a myth. To maintain this thesis one needs to prove hundreds of American intelligence reports, which used the term ODESSA, to be wrong, or one has to allege that those reports were just inventions by agents.ODESSAwas at least a roof network or common operational platform of cooperating individuals and groups just as Steinacher characterizes the networks (259). He mentions Heinz Schneppen’s book on ODESSA but does not discuss his main arguments in detail, although Schneppen offered examples of early texts on ODESSA such as the U.S.intelligence report of 26 February 1948.[12]

Second, for the Middle East one needs to include the Middle Eastern Brown-Green webs of ex-Nazi diplomats and their Islamist counterparts. Not only the Americans utilized ex-Nazis for intelligence and anticommunist purposes. The Muslim leaders did the same, but they also wanted the ex-Nazis’ anti-Jewish know-how for the struggle againstIsrael. In the Middle East, the Nazis’ influence, and the camaraderie with them, never ceased. This influence was also “diplomatically rebuilt” by the old-new envoys ofBonn(g) and passed down through the generations.

As Steinacher shows in a notable example of these interactions, former SS colonel Walter Rauff, hidden by Bishop Giuseppe Siri ofGenoa, fled toDamascusin1947. Inlate 1949 he used a Red Cross document and the fake name Bauermeister to flee fromGenoatoEcuador. There he worked for the Bayer Corporation and became a “rat runner.” In 1960, he visited his homeland under his real name. During the war, if General Erwin Rommel had been victorious, Rauff would have led an SS unit with the purpose of rounding up the Jews of Cairo and later of Palestine. Rauff also invented the mobile gas vans that killed thousands of Jews, and after the Eichmann trial he was indicted for crimes against humanity,[13] prompting him to flee to Chile. Governments there protected him from further prosecution, and in 1984 he died peacefully inSantiago. His funeral became a gathering of old Nazis who greeted each other with “Heil Hitler!”

Finally, in another representative case, Steinacher notes that Skorzeny introduced Willem M. Sassen, a war reporter and wanted SS man, to Eichmann in Argentina in 1954 (248). Eichmann had arrived there on 14 July 1950 (296) as “Ricardo Klement, technician,” carrying Red Cross papers. Hudal’s circles had assisted him in his escape route. Thus, all of the above-named groups contributed to this endeavor. There are also new indications that Simon Wiesenthal discovered Eichmann’s whereabouts in 1953 and proposed capturing him inArgentinain 1954. Why this actually took place six years later is another matter.

All in all, Steinacher’s fine book provides much insight and the possibility to draw comparisons with related developments in the Middle Eastand elsewhere. For instance, there are many parallels and common characteristics between the functioning of Al-Qa’ida and of the networks of Alte Kameraden. Steinacher clarifies how the southern escape route worked, including the role of its unrepentant operators. Nazis on the Run is an outstanding academic contribution.